Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Another consequence has been a rash of enhanced state and federal laws intended to crack down on what were viewed as sharp practices by the mortgage lending industry that harmed homeowner borrowers and, more broadly, their communities.An earlier post on this blog highlighted The New York Times' recognition of Minnesota at the forefront of such changes.In that context, it is noteworthy that Judge Tunheim, U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 10:19 pm
The Tenth Circuit held in Whittenberg v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 26, 2009)Affirming dismissal of fem manager's sex/discharge suitDC CircuitDouglas v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court (Mills v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"The Constitution, said the court, which protects "vehement, caustic and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks" in a political context, does not insist on complete verbal precision.Justice Smith then explained:"In this, the Constitution follows the common law of libel which, as the United States Supreme Court has observed, ‘overlooks minor inaccuracies and concentrates upon substantial truth' (Masson v New Yorker… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
She discussed the (in)famous R v Sharpe on CP offences vs freedom of expression, reading in exceptions re privately held material. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus answered yes, citing Noyd v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:00 pm
The decision in Kelo v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 8:46 pm
In Internet Specialties West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:32 pm
We have been presented with no good reason why compensation should be paid in one instance and not in the other.Gillette v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
First, consider US v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Sharp Electronics Corp., 2007 WL 2819660, *5 (N.D. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:37 am
Thomas' dissent in Altria Group v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm
We have seen a sharp uptick over the past eight weeks in the number of LTACHs looking for new or additional joint venture partners in an effort to help raise capital, streamline and reduce operations costs, and generally spread financial risk across multiple parties. [read post]
