Search for: "State v House"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 28,856
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
”Agin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
In Girard v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:12 pm
Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (Native American Housing Assistance and Self–Determination Act)Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 3:30 am
If the policy is silent, look to the law of your state. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:21 pm
I’m eagerly awaiting the judgment in R(Weaver) v London & Quadrant, but, in one of those quirks of synchronicity, Bailii has just put the Court of Appeal Judgment in Donoghue v Poplar Housing & Regeneration Community Association Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 595 up online. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:10 am
” Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky condemned the anti-abortion actions of the Kentucky legislators, expressing that the bills passed by the House “have one goal in mind: to bring a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Burglary, defined to be the act of breaking into and entering the house of another in the night time with intent to commit a felony therein. 10. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
Supreme Court eminent domain case Kelo v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:47 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
State v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
Comer (2017) and Zelman v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am
However, the Administrative Court went a step further and considered whether, if she had a right to reside, the Secretary of State’s decision to exclude her from being eligible for housing or welfare benefits amounted to unlawful discrimination. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am
However, the Administrative Court went a step further and considered whether, if she had a right to reside, the Secretary of State’s decision to exclude her from being eligible for housing or welfare benefits amounted to unlawful discrimination. [read post]
