Search for: "State v. Black"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 9,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 9:31 am
Until the passage of the Voting Rights Act, blacks in some Southern states could not vote whatsoever, due to racial terrorism and laws such as "poll taxes," which impeded political participation.The Voting Rights Act forbids policies such a poll taxes that were blatantly designed to evade the 15th Amendment. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:34 pm
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionBrief in opposition for respondents-intervenorsAmicus brief of Former Department of Justice OfficialsAmicus brief of Cato InstituteAmicus brief of AlaskaAmicus brief of Arizona et al.Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal FoundationAmicus brief of National Black Chamber of CommerceAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationReply of petitioner BG Group PLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:22 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada very recently noted, since R. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:33 am
” The EEOC has appealed that case, captioned EEOC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:47 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:46 am
CHOCIEJ V. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:25 am
Nevertheless, it is, I would suggest, of interest not just as an example of things going wrong but also for stating clearly that judges, whilst being entitled to form a view as to the credibility of witnesses, should, where essential facts are in issue, make orders on the basis of evidence rather than "on the basis of an assumption and a belief". [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:42 am
The rule against discrimination stems from Batson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In Green v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:26 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
Horton v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am
” Department of Transp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
Stigmatic Injury, how the 11th Circuit got it wrong Laufer v Looper – the death of tester standing Laufer v Looper Ch. 2 (4) The division between the legitimate and (in my view) illegitimate uses of the ADA and FHA is not as black and white as this makes it seem. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:16 am
Colorado and Buck v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 8:15 pm
It is simply stated for the purpose of a disclosure to the parties of the chance contact.Such are the vagaries of life.Link: Miles v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
Partners v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
