Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 3681 - 3700 of 4,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am by Steve Hall
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am by Nabiha Syed
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am by INFORRM
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am by Carolyn Elefant
Think of what the state bars could do if they pooled their resources. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm by Mike Aylward
Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, S153852 (Cal. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
A mention in this regard may also be made of the developments in the United States and United Kingdom where this right has had [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Gene Quinn
We also have a controlled study in the United States relating to recognizing that strong patents rights spur economic growth and innovations that create new industries. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Abstract: This essay reads the public controversy surrounding Sonja Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm by Glenn
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
News The phone hacking scandal continues to dominate the legal media news agenda. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:48 am by emagraken
Caslavsky, 45 B.C.A.C. 62, and stated the following: A more recent case from this Court along similar lines is Brucks et al. v. [read post]