Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3 November 2020 R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 9:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
Another case, Duncan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am
That's why you first heard that Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am
R (on the application of SM (Rwanda) (AP)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10 May 2021 Kostal UK v Dunkley and Ors, heard 18 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm
., V&R unipress, 2023). [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 10:42 am
R. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In Tingley v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
(See prior posting.)Also yesterday in Rosenbrahn v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 2:05 pm
In Republic of Hungary v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:33 pm
., V&R unipress, 2023). [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:50 am
The cases to be heard before the court this year span the gamut of the First Amendment, Religious Freedom for Prisoners, the Status of Jerusalem (Zivotofsky v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Two cases are to be heard on Wednesday, October 31. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:56 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:04 am
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 May 2015. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]
