Search for: "State v. House" Results 3681 - 3700 of 28,805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2014, 4:12 pm by Giles Peaker
These were questions in Lawal & Anor v Circle 33 Housing Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 1514. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
However, the Administrative Court went a step further and considered whether, if she had a right to reside, the Secretary of State’s decision to exclude her from being eligible for housing or welfare benefits amounted to unlawful discrimination. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am by S
However, the Administrative Court went a step further and considered whether, if she had a right to reside, the Secretary of State’s decision to exclude her from being eligible for housing or welfare benefits amounted to unlawful discrimination. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm by NL
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:48 pm by NL
Particular highlights include: Baroness Hale of Richmond DBE QC, our keynote speaker, who has given a number of significant judgments on housing law cases in the last few years, including Austin v LB Southwark (tolerated trespass); Ali v Birmingham CC (Article 6 and homelessness); Rodriguez v Government of Gibraltar (discrimination in the allocation of housing); Meier v Secretary of State (scope of possession orders); and Pinnock… [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
True, Justice Anthony Kennedy in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 2:47 pm by David Smith
I am thinking here of Spencer v Taylor (which we analysed here), Charalambous v Ng, and now Edwards v Kumarasamy. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:15 pm
A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled on May 15 in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:17 pm
In such cases, the Supreme Court stated that the aggrieved creditor could get an equitable lien on the homestead although the creditor still could not force the sale of the house. [read post]