Search for: "State v. Light" Results 3681 - 3700 of 25,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
  On May 17, 2013, March received another Facebook message from Scarbrough, stating that he `had found the culprit’ and had appropriately disciplined that person. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 11:33 pm
Pimentel, a dispute over the assets of the onetime dictator of the island state, Ferdinand E. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681 (7th Cir 2010) (per curiam) (rejecting Second Amendment challenge to 18 USC § 922(g)(3), which makes it a criminal felony for one who is an unlawful user of, or addicted to, any controlled substance to possess a gun); United States v Seay, 620 F3d 919 (8th Cir 2010), pet. for cert. filed, Dec. 16, 2010 (same) (see also 620 F3d at 924-25, collecting cases); United States v Skoien, 614 F3d 638 (7th Cir 2010)… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The existence of the associated recordings later came to light and the Defendant gave three sets of undertakings, in return for financial payments, that he would deliver up all copies of the footage to the Claimant and not seek any further monetary payment. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am by MBettman
The overarching purpose of the Ohio Public Records Act is to shed light on the state government’s performance. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:00 am
When the township petitioned the Michigan Supreme Court to review the case, the state's high court instead vacated the Court of Appeals decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of another RLUIPA case the state Supreme Court had just decided-- Greater Bible Way Temple of Jackson v City of Jackson. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This religious freedom case asks whether the State of New York can prevent anti-abortion organizations from discriminating against employees based on their reproductive health decision-making, i.e., employees who have used contraception or have had an abortion.The case is CompassCare v. [read post]