Search for: "State v. Person" Results 3681 - 3700 of 76,163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:19 am
On June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Elonis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
The State allows officers to demand a driver give blood if they refused to take a breathalyzer test. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:51 am by Myers Freelance
The post Competitive Keyword Ads Go to Court: Edible Arrangements v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Taylor, Jan. 14, 2016, Washington State Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Samson v. [read post]
The previous leading authority on “white list” designation was R (Javed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWCA Civ 789. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:12 am by SO Issues
§ 9-27-356(b)(2) only if such registration is recommended by the person conducting the sex-offender risk assessment,1 and sex-offender registration was not recommended by the assessor in this case. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:19 am by INFORRM
In the present case he noted [60]: “The publication relied on is to one person only, who is the claimants’ solicitor. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 6:54 pm by Keith
The Central District of California granted summary judgment in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am by CMS
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:32 am by Steven G. Pearl
On summary judgment, Howard presented the declaration of an expert, who stated that custom and practice in the entertainment industry required clients to pay their personal managers post-termination commissions on the services that they rendered, and on engagements that they entered into, when the personal managers were representing them. [read post]