Search for: "State v. Save" Results 3681 - 3700 of 11,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  Thus, CMS saves money by allowing the states to underpay Medicaid providers in violation of the Equal Access provision, and draft regulations intended to shore up the Equal Access provision do not address this perverse incentive. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:21 pm by Elizabeth R. Kirk and Dr. Ingrid Skop
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
I concur in the majority opinion receding from Shop in the Grove, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:36 am by ihwiner
  Although state courts are slightly more efficient than federal courts in California due to the state courts’ own “fast track” rules (which yield intervals to trial of roughly twelve to eighteen months), wise disputants and their lawyers should always consider pre-litigation dispute resolution and ADR options before initiating a lawsuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am by CMS
  To the extent that the disputed items were so disqualified, SSE relied upon the saving provisions in List C, CAA 2001, s 23. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]