Search for: "State v. Self"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 14,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
But Chambers does not go so far as to hold that a defendant is denied a fair opportunity to defend himself whenever a state rule excludes favorable evidence, see United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 6:28 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
Greg May has brought to my attention a significant en banc decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
” Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:18 am
EEOC v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:10 pm
That thought played central role in Jachetta v. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 4:32 am
Whatever the causes, it is not self-evident that the growth in executive authority is bad, given that the foreign affairs challenges that the United States faces in the modern era are substantially different from those of the late eighteenth century. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am
Alaina Wadsworth, Chris Horsefield and Ben Brown, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this month, in the matter of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13: Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the matter of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:21 am
Crawford v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
In the second case, United Food & Commercial Workers Union & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:05 am
The legislative intent of §36, said the court, was “to enable a town or village to rid itself of an unfaithful or dishonest public official," citing Matter of Miller v Filion, 304 AD2d 1016.In the words of the court, “It is firmly established that removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 is unwarranted in the absence of allegations of "self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or… [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 10:04 am
Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:50 am
Chang v Yi Lin 2024 NY Slip Op 33338(U) September 20, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 161222/2023 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:38 am
See, e.g., Pratt v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am
Last year the Court of Appeals in Marmelstein v Kehillat New Hempstead: The Rav Aron Jofen Community Synagogue, 11 NY3d 15 [2008], stated that in order for the congregant to demonstrate the existence of a fiduciary duty:a congregant must set forth facts and circumstances in the complaint demonstrating that the congregant became uniquely vulnerable and incapable of self-protection regarding the matter at issue (Marmelstein, 11 NY3d at 22). [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 3:17 pm
But the state may not unilaterally exercise that right and, thereby, interfere with the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens who seek to carry for self-defense outside of their own homes. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 7:04 pm
This is sometimes stated that directors have no duty to engage in self-flagellation. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm
However, in EBC, Inc. v. [read post]
