Search for: "Styles v. State" Results 3681 - 3700 of 5,641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 10:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Dallas Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case styled, Farmers Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
Whether the opinion will require all states to experiment with percentage plans before ever making individualized use of  race, or will simply indicate that those states which do have percentage plans that are working reasonably well have no occasion to do anything else, is hard to guess. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:19 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, Amtrust Insurance Co. of Kansas, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:13 pm by Venkat
Eleck" "MySpace Profile Evidence Inadmissible to Show Defendant Committed 'Gangster Style' Robbery -- U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm by FDABlog HPM
  As we previously reported, the case, styled as In re Cipro Cases I & II, was initiated in late 2000 and is a proceeding of nine coordinated cases brought by indirect CIPRO purchasers. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version:  March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm by Jay Stanley
(There is one legitimate Free Speech Zone we don’t have a problem with, it’s called the United States of America.) [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:11 pm by Jay Stanley
(There is one legitimate Free Speech Zone we don’t have a problem with, it’s called the United States of America.) [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:31 am by Robert L Abell
And the Supreme Court ruled that a general verdict that can be supported by at least one theory is enough, even though it is impossible to tell which theory the jury actually relied on, in Griffin v United States, 502 US 46 (1991). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am by Rosalind English
The court rejected the “bold” submission, stating that there was no precedent anywhere in the world and such socially controversial changes were only for Parliament. [read post]