Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 3681 - 3700 of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2017, 10:48 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The United States Supreme Court is trying to understand how that happened. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:35 am by Ryan Scoville
Neither result is a good one, but they’re roughly equivalent insofar as the United States is allies with both countries. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Petition for certiorari Brief of the United States in opposition Case summarily reversed: Docket: 08-10537 Title: Porter v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am by Rory Little
United States), in which the Court will consider whether there an Apprendi right to jury trial for mandatory minimum sentencing facts. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 4:10 am by Guest Author
United States limited one form of potential accountability for lawless presidents. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:51 am by SHG
Europe isn’t the United States. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am by Florian Mueller
The top U.S. court's decision follows (literally and figuratively) the position taken by the Solicitor General of the United States, which was not a given but isn't much of a surprise either.While I still believe the three Federal Circuit panel judges who threw out the $119 million decision got it right, the Supreme Court can only hear a limited number of cases per year. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm by Florian Mueller
Two weeks after the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its opinion in Alice v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:41 am by David Oscar Markus
This is good news and it's good to see that his nomination is moving relatively quickly.Looks like I have some light reading to do now that I'm back -- Judge Carnes issues two lengthy and significant opinions last week -- United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:34 pm by Howard S. Altarescu
We expect that Midland Funding will file a certiorari petition in the United States Supreme Court on November 10. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am by SHG
Otherwise, chances are pretty good that they will believe that you ruined their chances of "justice" by failing to raise that winner point, the one you left on the table.But try to cover them all and you can anticipate some snarky judge to write what Third Circuit Judge Aldisert did in United States v. [read post]