Search for: "United States v. Lively"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 11,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 8:28 pm
Witcher v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:51 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit today held that foreign governments are free to spy on, injure, or even kill Americans in their own homes--so long as they do so by remote control. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:52 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm
” In other words, a Montana warrant would purportedly empower police to seize digital content stored outside the United States, including the content of foreign persons living in foreign countries. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
The Constitution of the United States has been called the world’s most important legal document. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
See Wilson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:53 am
Today, it is still legal to import, sell, and use raw asbestos and products containing asbestos in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:08 pm
These laws would affect about 40 million reproductive-aged individuals who live in these states. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:45 pm
Here are the facts:"On February 16, 2017, RHS students protested in support of 'A Day Without Immigrations,' a nationwide boycott that sought to illustrate the economic impact of immigrants in the United States and to protest President Donald J. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am
Ultimately, the greatest significance of the Winn-Dixie decision may lie in its potential to finally thrust this issue into the United States Supreme Court on Gil’s anticipated petition for certiorari in the near future. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 6:33 am
The Court, citing the United States Supreme Court precedent of Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:30 am
United States (Ariella Banin & Micaela Lucero, Cornell Legal Information Institute) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
The United States will be represented by Deputy Solicitor General Greg Garre. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Perez, et al., No. 17-586 (Supreme Court of the United States, decided June 25, 2018). [read post]
