Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 4,493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2010, 6:27 pm
Lynn, Executive Director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State; Dr. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
A wrap-up essay will then focus on some potentially constructive policy reforms that could assist media enterprises without a massive infusion of state support or regulation of the press. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
, 514 U.S. 695 (1995), that a federal court is not a department or agency of the United States for the purposes of making false statements in a matter within the jurisdiction of the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Green v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Thornton (1995) -- rejected state imposition of term limits on members of Congress, holding that the Constitution prohibits states from adopting congressional qualifications in addition to those enumerated in the Constitution.Clinton v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
As a revered member of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Stevens will be remembered in American History for many things, not the least of which is his 2008 concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
" There is a concern that certain justices have an agenda in Indian law cases, he added, noting that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has been quoted as asking what is so special about Indian tribes and their relationship to the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:11 am
This trend reached its logical extreme in the Supreme Court case of Kelo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
See, Snyder v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
(Orin Kerr) “Yes,” says Judge Maurice Paul in United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:19 pm
In Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
" Stevens leaves a diverse legal legacy, authoring landmark decisions ranging from Reno v ACLU, the 1997 decision that anointed the internet with broad First Amendment protection, to Chevron v Natural Resources Defense Council [1984], which has guided the administrative state ever since. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
See Nomination of John Paul Stevens to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 94th Cong. 78 (1975). [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
Justice John Paul Stevens is stepping down from the United States Supreme Court, leaving President Obama to pick another Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
Nixon appointed him to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Chicago, in 1970.Justice Stevens maintained an active life outside the court, and did much of his work from a home in Florida, for years piloting his own plane there and back. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
Paul Financial LLC, No. [read post]
