Search for: "Wells v. State"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 66,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2008, 6:55 pm
Ellis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
United States, a federal district court in (red state) Oklahoma concluded that an amendment to the state’s constitution banning the celebration of same-sex marriages was unconstitutional under Windsor, as well as other precedents. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:28 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:45 pm
State, 394 Md. 184, 201 (2006); see Harrison v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm
In Mosley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices spar with counsel over excluding securities litigation from state courts
2 Dec 2015, 5:25 am
Twombly and Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:26 pm
Or was that rescue an act of constitutional usurpation, no more legitimate than the effort of southern states during the 1950s to insist that states could nullify Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:30 am
South Carolina v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:30 am
South Carolina v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
(It protects donors as well, from unwanted child support obligations.) [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 9:06 am
Feldman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 8:34 am
MySpace, Gentry v. eBay, Wilson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:36 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:36 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
This was the case in Martin v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
Comer Today's brief is of Schall v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
The 20 states’ Attorneys General, who were led by Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri, alleged that any online dispensing of medications used for abortion would not only violate their states’ laws, but also would possibly implicate the federal Comstock Act, which was enacted in 1873 and prohibits the mailing of “[e]very article or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion,” as well as “[e]very article, instrument,… [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:56 am
The question here is whether this symbolic resolution strips Hawaii of its sovereign authority to sell, exchange, or transfer 1.2 million acres of state land--29 percent of the total land area of the State and almost all the land owned by the State--unless and until it reaches a political settlement with native Hawaiians about the status of that land.Here's how the OHA stated it:Whether the Hawaii Supreme Court acted within its authority in relying upon… [read post]
