Search for: "Williams v. Williams"
Results 3681 - 3700
of 19,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 4:54 am
William Narrow, the research director of the DSM-V task force and a psychiatrist who works for the Arlington Va. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
In Barenblatt v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 10:00 am
In Smith v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:29 am
William Gagne, Jr. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:24 pm
Discrimination/RetaliationWilliams v. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
" A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:09 am
Williams v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
William Jimenez, No. 21-2954 (2d Cir. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:01 pm
Department of Health and Human Services (Indian Health Care Improvement Act)Williams v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 2:12 pm
Williams (2008)). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:14 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
"A motion to renew, opined the Appellate Division, is not a second chance to remedy inadequacies that occurred in failing to exercise due diligence in the first instance, and the denial of a motion to renew will be disturbed only where it constituted an abuse of the trial court's discretion" (Walden v Varricchio, 195 AD3d 1111, 1114 [2021] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Williams v Annucci, 175 AD3d 1677, 1679 [2019]). [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
(Superior Court of Stanislaus County, No. 624500, William A. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
California (1941) – Clare PastoreRemaking the “Law of the Poor”: Williams v. [read post]