Search for: "A B" Results 3701 - 3720 of 158,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 7:10 am by Simon Lester
If these measures, which violate both GATT Article III:4 and SCM Agreement Article 3.1(b), are not included on the list, I'm not sure there is much point to the list. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:08 am by Lauren Archibald
The diversity data under Form B would be based on voluntary self-disclosure by directors and executive officers. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:44 am by Unknown
Armistice Capital, LLC, March 27, 2024, Rochon, J.).Exchange Act Section 16(b) bars short-swing insider profits (and the court held that derivative plaintiffs do have Article III standing to bring Section 16(b) claims). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 5:38 am by Sherica Celine
By Jake Nelson One of the foundations of the practice of law is the legal memorandum. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:57 am by JR Chaves
Sus escritos sobre función pública han sido legendarios por su claridad, orden y contundencia, publicados en la década prodigiosa (1980-1990) en que se  gestó básicamente el modelo de función pública actual, a golpes de doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional (por cierto, criticada por don Ramón en cuanto éste consideraba que el modelo laboral no se ajustaba a las exigencias constitucionales), y de la pionera Ley de Medidas… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:46 am by JR Chaves
B) En cambio, aunque se probasen las funciones de un GRUPO O SUBGRUPO SUPERIOR. la cosa se complica si se pretende se abone el sueldo de éste: pero si se tratase del ejercicio de funciones propias de un subgrupo superior la irregularidad sería más grave pues incidiría ya en el sueldo y este va asociado al subgrupo de clasificación. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am by Marcel Pemsel
Art. 7(1)(b),(3) CTMR It was common ground that MHCS’ trade mark lacked inherent distinctiveness. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Last week, the State of California moved to dismiss the challenge, advancing three arguments: The Supremacy Clause and extraterritoriality claims should be dismissed on ripeness and standing grounds (Rule 12(b)(1)); The Supremacy Clause claim should be dismissed for failure to state a claim (Rule 12(b)(6)); The extraterritoriality claim should be dismissed for failure to state a claim (Rule 12(b)(6)); and Sovereign immunity bars all claims against the California… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Short of greenwashing, which regulations such as the EU Taxonomy will curb, such a mandate implies subsidizing low-carbon innovation until it will become profitable in a decarbonized world, in the spirit of the delegated philanthropy theory of Bénabou & Tirole. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In recent months, the U.S. banking regulators have proposed policy statements focused on providing greater insight on the agencies’ review of bank mergers and acquisitions under the Bank Merger Act (BMA).[1] On January 29, 2024, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (OCC NPRM) to (1) amend its procedures to eliminate expedited processing and the use of streamlined application forms for bank mergers and (2) adopt a policy statement that… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 6:52 pm by David Bernstein
Basically, the first change is admonishing judges that the admissibility of expert testimony is an issue for the judge to decide under the preponderance standard of Rule 104(a), and not, as some judges has been implicitly deciding, an issue for the jury under Rule 104(b) so long as a reasonable juror could decide the evidence is relevant. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 6:33 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
The Court noted, however, that WAC 392-400-430(8)(b) required the district to let the plaintiff go back to his regular educational setting when his suspension ended. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:14 am by Russell Knight
“[B]y order of the Illinois Supreme Court, the Illinois Rules of Evidence will govern proceedings in the courts of Illinois” Ill. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am by Dennis Crouch
In a recent decision, the Federal Circuit vacated a judgment of invalidity and remanded for a new trial, holding that the district court’s jury instruction on objective indicia of nonobviousness constituted prejudicial legal error. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:44 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/502(b) “A settlement agreement can be set aside if it is shown that the agreement was procured through coercion, duress or fraud, or if the agreement is unconscionable. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:17 am by Frank Cranmer
  Hill Ch noted that it was implicit from Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2004] 1 AC 546 that burying the dead is an act of a public authority for the purposes of s. 6(3)(b) Human Rights Act 1998, and it was therefore unlawful to do so in a way incompatible with Convention rights – and the Consistory Court was itself a public authority [9]. [read post]