Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 10,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Péloquin c. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
5 May 2009, 1:37 pm
The appeal is based on the wrong interpretation and application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94.By its first plea, the appellants claim that the Court committed an error of law in classifying the trade mark at issue as a neologism that was not noticeably different from the sum of its descriptive elements. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 2:38 pm
Finley and Michael D. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
United States, 17-7941 Issue: Whether a defendant who enters into a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement is generally eligible for a sentence reduction if there is a later, retroactive amendment to the relevant sentencing guidelines range. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:33 am
Hogg, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
§ 1692k(c). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
.* Assuming, but not deciding that Plaintiff's age and disability discrimination claims are cognizable under §1983, the Circuit Court said it must first determine if the facts alleged in Plaintiff's complaint “plausibly support” the following elements: [a] Plaintiff is a member of a protected class;[b] Plaintiff was qualified;[c] Plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action; and [d] Plaintiff demonstrated at least minimal support for the… [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
Even if this were not the case, wasn't JUMPSTAR devoid of distinctive character under Article 3(1)(b) of the same Directive? [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:22 am
Warenhandel [this sounds like the name of an American billionaire, by analogy with John D. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
Seven letters; begins with a B end with a D and is not Brevard county.)Blog contributor The Professor believes we are wrong, to wit:The Professor said...He is authorized to ban the usage under Rule 2.451 Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, which states:"(1) The use of electronic devices in a courtroom is subject at all times to the authority of the presiding judge or quasi-judicial officer to:(A) control the conduct of proceedings before the court;(B)… [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division rejected Respondent's "factual parsing of the incident" and concluded that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the ALJ from deciding again whether Petitioner's conduct amounted to physical abuse of the service recipient.Citing D'Arata v New York Cent. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Patent No. 8,177,449• Count V for Patent Infringement: Inducement To Infringe U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
.* Assuming, but not deciding that Plaintiff's age and disability discrimination claims are cognizable under §1983, the Circuit Court said it must first determine if the facts alleged in Plaintiff's complaint “plausibly support” the following elements: [a] Plaintiff is a member of a protected class;[b] Plaintiff was qualified;[c] Plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action; and [d] Plaintiff demonstrated at least minimal support for the… [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am
The patent proprietor requested that:- the decision of the opposition division to maintain European patent EP 1369037 Bl in amended form based on auxiliary request D be set aside and that the patent be maintained as granted- alternatively, that the patent be maintained in amended form on the basis of any of claim sets A-J or A'-I' in the following order: A, A', B, B', C, C', D, D', E, E', F, F',G,… [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Personne désignée B (C.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 11:16 pm
B. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:40 am
Bennett v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:40 am
Bennett v. [read post]
