Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 3701 - 3720 of 7,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
How does one write about the civil rights movement and never mention Charles Hamilton Houston, Robert Carter, or Constance Baker Motley? [read post]
1 May 2014, 6:11 am by Kevin
In addition, I point out that the author of the 1997 study cited above is currently the Chief Technology Officer for the U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
 The majority essentially says:  "We overrule circuit precedent adopting X approach. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
But what happens when X is legal and the officer reasonably (though incorrectly) believes that X is illegal? [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
"I have one brief comment: Howard does not know what he's talking about" #fordhamip #… -> Breaking News: Federal Circuit Reverse Judge Posner's Decision in Apple v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
 I get all that.But if all that's true, then why does the Court of Appeal hold that those general rules don't apply here? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Craig Whitney
”  Justice Samuel Alito echoed this sentiment when he remarked: “I need to know how far the rationale that you want us to accept will go, and I need to understand, I think, what effect it will have on these other technologies. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
Oral Anal Vaginal Married Matt X YZ XZ X Brett YZ YZ Adam XY X Z Mangum, in short, described three quite different “attacks. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Florian Mueller
Friday and Monday were bank holidays in Germany, and today I found out that Judge Dr. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
If I value X’s life more than my own and the only way to save X is to sacrifice myself, that sacrifice would be entirely rational in the sense that economists and rational choice theorists use the term. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Ruth Levush
(Id., Justice Elyakim Rubinstaein’s decision ¶x; this and additional translation from the Hebrew are mine). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 1:49 pm
 Why does X's lawsuit go forward but Y's lawsuit is dismissed? [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:08 am by David Lynn
[and] [i]t considered its own data as well and cost estimates submitted during the comment period . . . and arrived at a large bottom line figure that the Association does not challenge." [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:52 am by Trent Dykes
  While the Notice does invite public comment, it only does so with respect to “other types or aspects of virtual currency transactions that should be addressed in future guidance” and that are “not addressed in this [N]otice. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
In particular, the Court is empowered to rule only on the interpretation or the validity of European Union acts on the basis of the facts placed before it by the national court or tribunal (Case C-491/06 Danske Svineproducenter [2008] ECR I-3339, paragraph 23, and the judgment of 10 November 2011 in Joined Cases C-319/10 and C-320/10 X and X BV, paragraph 29). [read post]