Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
(Follow the links for Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV.) [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:16 am
In March, the Supremes will hear arguments in the Dukes v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm
Moreover, “state insurance department staff levels declined 11% in 2007 while premium volume increased 12%. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:25 am
Stoncor Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm
On Tuesday, in Fisher v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
In Indian society, a male spouse enjoyed the position of dominance for centuries together. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:05 pm
Haynes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
In any event, big business does not want independent inventors, small businesses or well funded start-ups to enjoy strong patent protection because that threatens their dominance. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:10 am
In Bravo v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:10 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 4:31 am
In Sands v The State of South Australia ([2010] SASC 340) the Supreme Court considered an application for a stay on the grounds of public interest immunity in an action for libel and misfeasance arising out of statements made in the course of a murder investigation. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:17 am
Think of what the state bars could do if they pooled their resources. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:02 pm
In 2001, the ACLU and NYCLU filed a sex discrimination lawsuit, Lochren v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
