Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 9,549
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 9:41 am
§1052(e)(1), “a trademark cannot be registered if it is ‘merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive’ of goods. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 7:43 am
Scheiner, Attorneys for the Injured, at 1-800-646-1210. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:57 am
Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 [1] Hearsay is an out-of-court statement tendered for the truth of its contents. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 8:43 am
(b) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:35 am
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
It acknowledged that it can, and often does, exactly what is being asked of it. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
“Information” in s.1(1) of FOIA focuses on the information itself: see Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority v Information Commissioner [2015] EWCA Civ 388 at [35] – [36]. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:05 pm
S. 35, 61 (2008) (plurality opinion). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am
Indeed, claim 1 does not comprise any technical feature characterizing the "reference voltage generation circuit" other than by the fact that it is located within the sensor holder and by the fact that it supplies a "reference voltage" to a sensor. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
You only need two things: (1) consistent financial returns and (2) time. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
You only need two things: (1) consistent financial returns and (2) time. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:00 am
In order to avoid royalty payments and supply agreements with Celgard, a host of competitors filed at least six inter partes review (IPR) petitions against the ‘586 patent.[1] Although the bulk of the challenges have been rejected or found without merit by the PTO, the PTAB ultimately agreed with one of the several grounds presented by LG and ruled claims 1-6 and 11 obvious over a combination of two Japanese published patent applications in a parts-and-pieces… [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm
SSWP [2016] 1 WLR 4550 the art 8 rights of someone who was not directly the benefit claimant were accepted as being affected by the Supreme Court, with no reasons required. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 8:08 pm
Does your patent attorney (or, if you are a patent attorney, do you) possess these attributes? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
AFFIRMED. ******************************* [1] In Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
[para 35]. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:59 pm
See William B Howell, 57 T.C. 546, 557 (1972); Real Estate Corp., 35 T.C. 610 (1961). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:27 am
Less than 1% of 2016 complaints resulted in litigation. [read post]
