Search for: "FRANKS v. STATE" Results 3701 - 3720 of 4,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The legal requirements, designed to protect media plurality when Murdoch bought the Times titles as he already owned The Sun and the News of the World, state the newspapers must be kept separate and editorially independent under the supervision of six independent directors. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 29 March 2023, judgment was handed down by Saini J in the3million & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWHC 713 (Admin). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Franks applies these rules, and in the process in some small measure reaffirms government employee speech protection. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, the firm filed at least two other election cases against the Secretary of State in that division (Gilby v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am by Thalia Kruger
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
 But, because even these principles have exceptions, as highlighted in Frank McRoberts’ post on the curious case of Webster v Forest Hills Care Ctr., LLC, which suggested that the right to an accounting might be absolute. [read post]