Search for: "Head v. Head" Results 3701 - 3720 of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2008, 9:22 pm
The IPKat thanks his trusty friend Kristof Neefs (Laga, Belgium) for drawing his attention to a press release today from Google, headed "Authors, Publishers, and Google Reach Landmark Settlement: Copyright Accord Would Make Millions More Books Available Online". [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
This challenge is illustrated by what happened to the taxpayer in Jenkins v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 5:46 pm
 Does having a marital affair disqualify you from leading troops in battle or heading a governmental agency, or being President or a member of the cabinet? [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:00 am by Larry
Today, my reminder comes in the form of Tyco Fire Products L.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm
In a controversial decision issued on February 25, a federal judge ruled that a moratorium on residential evictions, issued by the the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, violates the United States Constitution.In Terkel v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:37 am by Ben
Jane Mair (Head of School of Law, University of Glasgow) and Prof. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:25 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 9:14 am by Ryan Mulvey
  To illustrate: in National Security Archive v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 11:12 am
 The Hearing Officer relied extensively on the judgment in Love & Co Pte Ltd v The Carat Club Pte Ltd [2009] 1 SLR(R) 561. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am by Gritsforbreakfast
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 3:27 pm by Asude Sena Moya
The Enlarged Board is expected to provide comments by 17 April 2025.Guest UPCKats William Mooney and his team members (Carpmaels) reported on i-mop v Arcora (UPC CFI 193/2024) concerning decisions by default.Jocelyn Bosse explained T 0425/23 concerning issues of insufficiency of disclosure, novelty, and inventive step. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm by Susan N. Herman
He was across the street at the Supreme Court, watching the oral argument in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]