Search for: "IN RE: ENGLAND"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
By way of contrast, in England and Wales, section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 introduced a similar defence of publication on matter of public interest; it is in much simpler terms; and it was successfully invoked for the first time in Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (27 July 2016). [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
Over the few months that followed (we’re still in 1903), both the defendant and the Costa Rican government supposedly did what they could to slow McConnell down. [read post]
Ireland: Better late than never – the Defamation (Amendment) Bill 2024 is finally here – Eoin O’Dell
21 Aug 2024, 4:53 pm
Two not-so-good things There are two things in the Bill that I think could and should be improved, relating to its treatment of serious harm, and to its headline recommendation on the abolition of juries. 3.1 Serious harm In England and Wales, section 1(1) of the 2013 Act provides that a statement “is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm” to the reputation of the plaintiff (emphasis added). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:17 am
HM Treasury said in a report published Monday that it will carry out consultation on bringing digital payment companies that it deems to be systemically important within Bank of England regulation at the start of next year. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
In England’s earliest stages as a country after the Norman Conquest, it was difficult to say what legislation was. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 6:01 am
In England, civil disputes were first handled by the Court of Common Pleas, which Henry II carved out of the curia regis in the late twelfth century. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:17 am
HM Treasury said in a report published Monday that it will carry out consultation on bringing digital payment companies that it deems to be systemically important within Bank of England regulation at the start of next year. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 9:11 am
” Doug, you're absolutely correct! [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 6:14 am
It's not the broken promises and the outright lying, although we're getting close. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
Nothing you’ve done has put you in the lead that you’re in right now. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:00 am
For this example, we’ll analyze how marginal tax rates would work for a US expatriate living in England. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:46 am
(Re),[3] the Ontario Court of Appeal considered whether finality was an absolute requirement for recognition and enforcement of an order under REJUKA [4] In Cavell, the respondent, Cavell Insurance Company Limited (“Cavell”), a subsidiary of a British company, was registered in Ontario to accept property and casualty reinsurance business. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
[Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.] [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
And we're buying into it by letting them play along with us. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:32 am
If you tell the truth about how you’re feeling, it becomes funny. 81. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
You’re listening to episode 235 on Tuesday, January 18, 2011. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 7:46 am
That should ring true because that’s kind of like the common law we inherited from England, you know, the charter of the land and all. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:59 am
They’re just betting on something where they don’t have a stake, they’re not hedging legitimate risk. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
Painting wasn’t protected in England into 1862; Americans incorporated fine arts in 1870, so maybe they were following the English example. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 8:56 am
Their response was often an apologetic, “yes, but just with Canada and England. [read post]
