Search for: "In re D. W."
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2010, 4:42 pm
Just because you're rich doesn't mean you're a good person. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:45 pm
But, I must say, she said she'd be back in 30 minutes, and she was. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
The California Air Resources Board announced Wednesday that it has penalized Conopco Inc. d/b/a Unilever $1.3 million for illegal consumer sales of AXE Deodorant Bodyspray for Men. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:27 am
Here’s my initiative to deliver the Voices of Hope and Change to Washington: W’re Delivering the Voice of American Homeowners to Washington D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:29 am
Thompson, supra (quoting In re F.P., 878 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania 2005). [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
“I have a W-2 through my employer and contribute to their 401k plan. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:08 pm
& A. 1900), rev’d. on other grounds, 190 N.J. 342 (2007). [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:34 am
But some fraud on the FDA claims can’t be “preempted” because they’re not subject to the Supremacy Clause from which the preemption doctrine flows. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:27 pm
" Nevertheless, before you drain a swimming pool, make sure you're not simultaneously walking off a short diving board positioned over the middle of its deep end. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
” The court ultimately held that “this problem ... is an insurmountable barrier to class certification,” and therefore “decline[d] to certify the class under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
In 2004 Democrats sincerely believed that reelecting George W. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:42 am
Dabei macht der Beschwerdeführer nicht geltend, dass schon das vom Gesetzgeber verfolgte Ziel illegitim wäre, nämlich zu verhindern, dass die Verletzer von Urheberrechten in Bagatellfällen überzogene Anwaltshonorare bezahlen müssen. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
Sept. 26, 2006), aff’d in part and rev’d in part, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 299 (Cal. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:28 pm
Après moi le déluge [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:22 pm
Agree that there were large R&D costs. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
All the State had to prove under [§ 948.075] was that Bvocik `ha[d] reason to believe’ she was under sixteen. . . . [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
” Take the offer Matter fact, tell ‘em that you’ll work for free, And think before you tell ‘em that they’re choice #3 If you get an OCI friend, keep it on the low, nobody wanna know, you’ve got a ways to go If you get an in-firm interview, keep it on the low, nobody wanna know, you’ve got a ways to go If you get a dinner invite, keep it on the low, nobody wanna know, you’ve got a ways to go If you make it past that, then you’re… [read post]
