Search for: "LARGE v. LARGE"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 40,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2017, 8:08 am
Whether the Court should make a declaration of incompatibility under HRA 1998, s 4 in relation to the Access to Justice Act 1999, or even in respect of the costs regime which applies following LASPO and the Defamation Act 2013 (Declaration of incompatibility). (1) The rule in MGN v UK in domestic law Lord Neuberger considered that ECtHR’s decision in MGN v UK was “full and careful” and its reasons “largely sound” (based primarily on Sir Rupert… [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
The Court’s pending case in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
In Abood v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 3:45 pm
Even though it was a largely fact-bound opinion about whether a particular city's mobile home ordinance constituted a taking.And today the Ninth Circuit did precisely that. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:16 am
We have today a student post on Pfeffer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
Following on from the Case Preview (here), the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Arnold v Britton & Ors on 10 June 2015 in which the appellants’ appeal was dismissed by a majority of 4-1. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:00 pm
Haas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
And the Supreme Court is largely to blame for these errors. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:58 pm
So you could say that since he was subject to a certain degree to restrictions on his freedom, which he then violated, by doing so, he in essence "escaped" from that custody.On the other hand, yeah, he had some limitations on his freedom, but he was basically at large in the population, rather than in "custody" (at least as we typically define the term). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:51 pm
. - Judge Friedland's opinion says that transfer was improper largely by relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Hoffman, and the opinion repeatedly cites the relevant statute (transfers proper only "to any other district or division where it might have been brought. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
Especially since there are analogous California Supreme Court cases going both ways: one that says that a plea bargain can be retroactively withdrawn when subsequent legislation makes the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty not a crime at all (and hence would require his immediate release), but then a subsequent case that says that defendants aren't entitled to withdraw their plea even if subsequent legislation deprives 'em of a large part of the benefit of their… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 11:45 am
There are some serial claims and evidence of child abuse, and the social workers do a thorough investigation over a long period of time and regarding a large number of different claims as they arise. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:16 pm
You have a large incentive to so recall.By contrast, if you originally submit a declaration that says you mailed it on Day X, that may not prove that you mailed it on that day. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 2:58 pm
Mailhoit v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 1:15 pm
In Ferra v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
Cascades Computer Innovation LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:12 am
Because this project is funded largely with taxpayer dollars, these increased costs of construction, which the Respondents-Intervenors in moving to lift the stay estimated at $10–12 million, will burden the public upon continued delay. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 9:11 am
" The plaintiff, Western Watersheds Project (WWP), originally filed the action in 2004 challenging the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) renewal of grazing permits in the Jarbidge Resource Area (JRA), covering a large expanse of Southern Idaho. [read post]
