Search for: "London v. State"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 6:31 am
In Hrvatska Elektroprivreda v Slovenia [ICSID Case No ARB/05/24 (6 May 2008)] the defendant, in an arbitration before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investments Disputes (ICSID) waited until one week before a substantive hearing, to disclose to the tribunal and the claimant, a list of lawyers who would be attending. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:29 am
(1) Roger Shashoua (2) Rodemadan Holdings Ltd (3) Stancroft Trust Ltd v Mukesh Sharma [2009] EWHC 957 (Comm) involved a dispute over a shareholders agreement governed by Indian law, which contained an arbitration clause providing for an arbitration in London, under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
McConkey and another (Appellants) v The Simon Community (Respondents) (Northern Ireland) [2009] UKHL 24 (20 May 2009) Odelola (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2009] UKHL 25 (20 May 2009) R (on the application of G) (FC) (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondents) [2009] UKHL 26 (20 May 2009) Smith (Appellant) v [...] [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
The outsourcing of s.202 Housing Act 1996 reviews by local authorities to private, commercial bodies came under scrutiny in Charlotte Augustin v London Borough of Barnet, Central London County Court, 22 May 2009 (no report available online yet). [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:14 am
Midgulf (M) was a trader in sulphur and Groupe Chimiche Tunisien (G) was a company owned by the state of Tunisia. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:13 pm
McKenzie, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2009] EWHC 1097 (Admin) was a Judicial Review initially brought on grounds that the local authority refused to provide the claimant with temporary accommodation following her notification by the hostel she was living in that she would not be able to remain once her baby was born. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Wallace, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Special Agent.U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:28 am
V. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
The Secretary of State’s submissions were clear as to the result. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:57 am
Another case to watch: Pietrylo v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 3:31 pm
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 5:25 am
Relying on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:14 am
Based on London v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
Currently only as a note on Lawtel or ALL ER, R (Prince) v Social Security Commissioners & SoS for the DWP & London Borough of Southwark (Interested parties) (2009) QBD (Admin), concerns what can only be described as a bit of a chancer. [read post]
11 May 2009, 11:38 am
So, only a day or so late… A v London Borough of Croydon [2009] EWHC 939 (Admin) is a significant case in a long and convoluted saga. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:27 pm
The finding of fact on redecoration was wrong as the landlord was entitled to do this under the lease, as the state of decoration was poor. 3. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:15 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
In a judgment published yesterday (Shashou & Ors v Sharma ([2009] EWHC 957 (Comm)), Cook J. ruled that West Tankers is irrelevant when the injunction enjoins the parties from litigating in India in contravention with an agreement providing for ICC arbitration in London. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:42 am
The owners of the Seawheel Rhine were sued both by the owners of the Assi Euro Link and by the Dutch State in the Dutch court of Groningen. [read post]
