Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Minn. 1999) (granting summary judgment); Broussard by Lord v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
(Internet Cases) Global - Trade Marks Non-commercial groups oppose changes in ICANN Committee (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Patents Lord Hoffman in agreement with Tufty the Cat on software patents? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:31 am
Just who they are varies from state to state, but they've included doctors who can't get hospital privileges anywhere, felons doing time for drug offenses, former EMTs, and . . . . [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
Sedley LJ and Lord Clarke MR agreed with Rix LJ, but Sedley LJ expressed some dissatisfaction with this case. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
It would be an undesirable state of affairs if Swindon lost the power to take action against Mr Redpath merely because he had been evicted. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:26 am
Now, the Court of Appeal was dealing with a question of trespass to land but, having regard to the House of Lords’ remarks in Fisher v Brooker, may be worth bearing in mind in intellectual property cases as, generally, an IP owner seeks an injunction when their rights are being infringed [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
In 2000, the House of Lords effectively approved these conditions, in the landmark case on the point - Inco Europe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:13 am
The decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352 may need to be reversed.All these proposals are designed to reduce costs disputes and reduce the cost of costs disputes. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 11:21 pm
In Dwares v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:07 am
(IP Osgoode) Katz on copyright collectives (Michael Geist) Geof Glass of Vancouver Fair Copyright on how Canada’s new copyright law will affect you (Michael Geist) CIPPIC launches DigitalAgenda.ca (Michael Geist) Brad Fox on reducing the term of copyright (Michael Geist) Green Party on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Vancouver Fair Copyright Coalition issues copyright consultation guide (Michael Geist) Writers Guild urges action on copyright (Michael Geist) Canada action alert: Speak out… [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:14 am
There is no difference between this Ten Commandments display and the one at the Texas state capitol that was upheld by the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
Praise the lord and pass the ammunition. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
Lord Reid stated in McGhee v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
College of Dental Surgeons of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:35 am
R (Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 2 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Comrs [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
V. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
: Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (PatLit) Is it safe? [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:21 am
Moses v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:41 am
There was no rule of construction and no rule of law which stated that a reinsurer must respond to every valid claim under the insurance irrespective of the terms of the reinsurance.The most important aspect to the decision was the way in which the Lords distinguished the present case from the decision of the House of Lords in Vesta v Butcher [1989] AC 852. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
YouTube: From House of Lords to Supreme Court Parliament News: From House of Lords to Supreme Court Further information Parliament News: Work of the Law Lords Judicial Work Judicial Business House of Lords judgments About Parliament: Judgments About Parliament: Law Lords Briefing: Judicial work of the House of Lords (PDF) [read post]
