Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 55,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
I would not say, as I think the majority does, that a defendant in a criminal case, pro se or otherwise, need not be advised of an opportunity to make closing remarks to the jury. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:57 pm
Judge Nguyen dissents, but Judge Murguia joins the majority opinion, so it's a new trial for Mr. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
Or, worse, what the jury instructions in such cases should say.Witness this opinion.The majority and the dissent disagree about both what to do in situations like this one as well as what exactly transpired here. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:36 pm
The Eighth Circuit has held otherwise, so the Ninth Circuit joins the majority rule.Okay. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:57 pm
"(2) In the majority opinion, the sly little joke from Judge McKeown: "Admittedly, the validity of the Proclamation—an Antiquities Act order that implicates the O&C Act—presents a statutory thicket. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:41 am
Wrong.The majority says it is. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
But I'd have signed onto the majority opinion. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 10:15 am
Affirmance is required by the conclusions of the judges in the majority, even though the reasoning of Judge Gould and Judge Bea in their separate concurrences filed herewith is different. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 11:01 am
The majority’s rote application of section 231.7 defeats this goal. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:21 am
In a rather significant development in the TTAB's fraud jurisprudence, the Board has re-designated as precedential its decision in Zanella Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:30 pm
Both of which had major impacts far beyond their size. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:07 am
" Rita v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:58 am
Stern (formerly Marshall v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:06 pm
Kauff v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 5:04 am
Until State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:27 am
(The case is Kansas v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:33 am
” Golan v. [read post]
