Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 3701 - 3720 of 7,023
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2014, 9:55 am by Ruth Levush
January 1 of this year marked the twentieth anniversary of the entry into force of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed between the United States, Mexico and Canada. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:10 am by Jeff Foust
(Congress goes on recess at the end of this week and does not return until after Labor Day.) [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 2:09 pm by JP
However, that is not who I want in Congress, or what I want them to be focusing on. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:32 am by Jeff Foust
I urge my colleagues in Congress and in the Administration to make that program a reality. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:58 am by Margaret Wood
McMullen, ass’t. judge advocate (Oct. 28, 1925), Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division, http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3c33701 Home with a cold this spring, I was re-reading a mystery novel which centered in part around the fate of a British officer in World War I. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
I-Flow Corp., 2011 WL 1361562, at *2, 3-4 (D. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Below the fold I offer a summary of the opinion, followed by some preliminary thoughts on the decisions’ impact on the government’s review of corporate transactions that implicate national security. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 8:22 am by Jane Chong
According to the Wall Street Journal, the “convergence of security crises” from the Middle East to the South China Sea marks a “breadth of global instability” unseen since the late 1970s. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
That circumscription of legislative authority would mark a major shift of constitutional power away from Congress, which makes the laws, and toward the President, who is supposed to enforce them None of the above means that Speaker Boehner’s lawsuit will (or should) succeed. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Court did not rule that Congress lacked the power to regulate marriage, but it did hold that DOMA was invalid because it marked a stark deviation from a long history and tradition of the federal government’s deferring to state-law determinations of marital status. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  As I explained on Tuesday, however, the Court's specific holding in the case is quite narrow, and is therefore consistent with the past few decades of Court jurisprudence. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Finally, as Thursday marked Ritika’s last day as Lawfare’s associate editor, Ben shared some remarks on her time with us. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
 That birth we celebrate with fireworks and bratwurst and, well, I guess no doubleheaders. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Andrew Pincus
  In that situation, the mark of a successful advocate is his or her success in limiting the damage. [read post]