Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 11:57 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) Robert G. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
In North Carolina, common law robbery is punished as a Class G felony. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:05 pm
§ 3729(a)(1)(G).) [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
C. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
SONIA VALVERDE; from Bexar County;4th district (04-08-00587-CV & 04-08-00857-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 06-10-09, pet denied Oct 2009) (designation of responsible third party, timelines, limitations, res judicata)09-0663 MICHAEL G. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:09 pm
Separate Property of Each PartyThe parties wish to identify what will remain the separate property of each party during the domestic partnership, and to determine their rights in the event of a separation or dissolution of their domestic partnership, as hereinafter discussed.The following shall constitute and remain the “separate property” of the respective parties: (a) property, whether real or personal, and whether vested, contingent, or inchoate, belonging to or acquired by a party… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:21 pm
Section 145 in that Chapter provides for definitions:(a) authorised insurer, (b) certificate of insurance, (c) liability, (d) policy of insurance, (e) property, (f) reciprocating country and (g) third party.9. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 22599, 2008-Ohio-3859 (petition for writ of prohibition dismissed) In re: State of Ohio, ex rel., Jeremy G. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:27 am
Vartabedian, Allison G. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:28 pm
Alvin C. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
Pix Credit hereEven though I do not find it plausible that the military operation is being conducted withgenocidal intent, I voted in favour of the measures indicated by the Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription: awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5] While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014: see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
When the Commission provided its interim advice to Ministers on Strasbourg reform in 2011, it accompanied it by a letter which raised the perception of some, either expressed to the Commission or of some Commission members, that the Court is at times “too interventionist in matters that are more appropriate for national legislatures or courts to decide”. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
Analysis and Suggestions: As stated in Part I, in connection with the related proposed Appendix G amendments, I believe that OPR has failed to cite sufficient legal support for mandating all projects to conduct an Appendix F energy analysis as part of required CEQA review. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
(I don’t think this is right—it’s about a normative statement that no actionable confusion is likely as a matter of law. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
In some instances these issues touch on matters that have significant relevance to political and legal theory generally, and for this reason alone are worth reading. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
C. [read post]
