Search for: "May v. May" Results 3701 - 3720 of 182,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" Without further comment, here is Breytman v Schechter ; 2011 NY Slip Op 51375(U) ;  Supreme Court, Kings County   Schack, J. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:15 am
Supreme Court, in a summary disposition, vacated and remanded to the Sixth Circuit decision in in Kimberlin v Renasant Bank (Dkt No 08-816) for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court's Court's May 4, 2009 decision, Arthur Andersen LLP v Carlisle ___U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:53 pm by Devin Montgomery
The US Supreme court on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:29 pm by Jeanne M. Hannah
The Michigan Court of Appeals decided Clarke v Clarke, ___ Mich App ____ (2012) on June 26, 2012. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:38 am by Taylor Gillan
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Wednesday ruled in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Earlier this month, I blogged about Chancellor McCormick’s decision in Sjunde AP-fonden v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
The Trustee argued this debtor lived alone and claimed an ownership expense for a 03 Toyota Tacoma and a 06 Yamaha 650 V-star motorcycle. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:24 am by Bradley McAllister
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-2 Wednesday in Bank Markazi v Peterson [SCOTUSblog materials] that the enactment of a statute allowing terrorism victims' families to collect seized Iranian assets does not violate separation of powers, even if it directs a particular result in a single pending case. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 7-2 in Holland v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:01 am by Addison Morris
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Tuesday in Holt v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:18 am by Taylor Gillan
The decision will allow lawmakers to place a nonbinding question on ballots to ask voters whether they feel there should be a new amendment to the US Constitution to overturn the 2010 US Supreme Court [official website] decision in Citizens United v. [read post]