Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 3701 - 3720 of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:57 am by Florian Mueller
On Twitter, I--as a litigation watcher who has been following countless U.S. patent and antitrust cases over the past 12+ years--warned people against relying on Idas's unfortunate misinterpretation:Well, the information on the judge having granted the request for an extension is NOT reliable. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
As opposed to reinvesting capital in growing our business and hiring people, we have to spend all of our money on these lawsuits. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 4:51 am by Ben
v=9eN0CIyF2ok And finally, remember Re-Digi? [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Unknown
The IRS had tried to regulate tax return preparers under the regulatory authority of 31 U.S.C. section 330, but in Loving v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:05 am
This is our chance to spot, support and develop the skills of the people who will be fuelling our future economy. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:42 am
Many affronts of the billThe definition provided in the bill not only goes against the grain of logic but also defeats the fine reading of third gender attempted by the 2014 judgement of the Supreme Court in National Legal Services Authority v Union of India (“NALSA”). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm
It was common ground that the name Canary Wharf would be recognised by the great majority of people in the United Kingdom as designating a business district of London. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 1:00 pm
That bad old billionaire racist Donald Sterling had fallen out of the news, and here's V. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
§ 331(1) states “Any person who violates a provision of section 331 of this title shall be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined not more than $1,000, or both. [read post]