Search for: "People v. White"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 7,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
White Dress of Marilyn Monroe from The Seven Year Itch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dress_of_Marilyn_MonroeThe Copyright Board’s K-12 decision for 2010-2015 was released on February 19, 2016. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
When separation fails, people are actually harmed, the government tells us. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
In other news, Ministers have been urged to reassess the law giving anonymity for people making allegations about sexual offences. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:42 am
Us/them, black/white framing may not be helpful in discourse, even as to private law/public law. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
A lot of people do seem to subscribe to this view. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
” He also claimed that a white sales rep. complained to the CEO that the employee should not have been hired because “black people did not buy mopeds and ATVs” and that “black people do not ride ATV’s [and] do not come to shows,” and “a black person cannot sell power sports in the South. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
One potential candidate, who is reportedly being vetted by the White House, is Judge Jane Kelly. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
” More than 43,000 people signed the campaign’s petition. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
“Tool Without a Handle”: Tools for Terror; Tools for Peace This blog has addressed principles and challenges in countering odious online content – both content which transgresses the law and content which, while odious, is nonetheless protected free expression.[1] In particular, I’ve touched on regulation of such content, noting principled distinctions between regulation of protected speech and regulation of justifiably restricted content that is illegal even… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:01 am
In Worcester v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:41 pm
Be sure to use a standard paste – using Ctrl V or “Keep Source Formatting” – rather than “Paste and Keep Text Only. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:58 am
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:20 pm
Daxton White. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:22 am
In its complaint, filed with the DOL’s Office of Administrative Law Judges (Perez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
As the white population advanced, that of the Indians necessarily receded. [read post]
