Search for: "Persons Service Company, LLC"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 5,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm
* Custom LED, LLC v. eBay, Inc., 2012 WL 1909333 (N.D. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:40 am
© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm
Persons that have knowledge of pharmaceutical fraud can file a whistleblower lawsuit under the False Claims Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
“If there is no knowledge requirement, does a copyright holder need to show that a service provider possesses ‘something more than the ability to remove or block access to materials posted on a service provider’s website’ in order to have the right and ability to control infringement? [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
” Rearden LLC is the one that really does this; Rearden Productions LLC and Rearden Studios LLC specialize in high definition and animated movie production services, while Rearden Properties LLC is a property ownership and management company that rents three units in a San Francisco building to the other Rearden entities. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:15 am
© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
Just before the accident, Hoover, an Emergency Water Extraction Services, LLC (“EWES”) employee, delivered a ladder to an independent contractor who was making repairs on a roof. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of medical expenses… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of medical expenses… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:05 pm
As the financial services company went on to bid for the bonds every day, the bond price doubled. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
Humana clearly has a personal legal interest sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Co. and Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., No. 10-0960 (DB). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
Prior cases upholding laws under this clause “involved exercises of authority derivative of, and in service to, a granted power,” he wrote. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:08 am
This definition specifically excludes independent contractors.It should be noted that the US Supreme Court recently ruled in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
When it comes to understanding the potential risks, costs, and advantages of the various investment “products” offered today, a prudent investor must begin by understanding the role of the person from whom they are purchasing the investment. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
That is, a Minnesota corporation must indemnify any person made party to a proceeding because of her former or present official capacity if the person (1) has not been otherwise indemnified, (2) has acted in good faith, (3) has received no improper personal benefit, and (4) had no reasonable cause to believe her conduct was unlawful. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Patent No. 7,320,031 entitled AUTOMATIC, PERSONALIZED ONLINE INFORMATION AND PRODUCT SERVICES and owned by Personalized User Model (PUM). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Patent No. 7,320,031 entitled AUTOMATIC, PERSONALIZED ONLINE INFORMATION AND PRODUCT SERVICES and owned by Personalized User Model (PUM). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:45 am
The Facts of the Case Young & McQueen Grading Company, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
Because those covenants usually are viewed as non-assignable personal service contracts, they may be unenforceable by the surviving entity, absent each employee’s express consent, if the covenants are seen as pertaining solely to the disappearing company which executed them. [read post]
