Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS" Results 3701 - 3720 of 12,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
‘Should proceedings before the future UPC not comply with the standards of treatment under an IIA, which was signed by a Contracting Member State to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), the investor whose rights under the IIA would be infringed by acts of the UPC could initiate arbitral proceedings on the basis of the IIA against the Contracting Member State. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
Ross, Short Circuit on Turner v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by Dan Maurer
There was the abrupt announcement of “mission accomplished” against the Islamic State in Syria and the decision to withdrawal substantial forces from Afghanistan, contrary to advice from senior military commanders and to the surprise of most of Congress. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Clearly, big attention-grabbing cases such as Lloyd Rayney v The State of Western Australia (damages of $1.8m, including damages for economic loss, with another $773,866 in interest), Rebel Wilson v Women’s Day, Women’s Weekly, New Weekly and OK! [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 12:10 pm by Kevin
In Naperville Smart Meter Awareness v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Online state surveillance: The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), has come almost completely into force, including amendments following the Watson/Tele2 decision of the CJEU. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
”  The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]