Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 7,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:37 pm
Because under Miller v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Will has an article in the upcoming issue of Newsweek, Cruelty in the Court, discussing the issues at stake in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Chief Justice William Howard Taft in Meyers v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:51 pm
A similar issue arose in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:12 am
by Margaret Sachs [Margaret V. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (1999), which dealt with the “injury in fact” standard to provide standing to a qui tam plaintiff, and Lujan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
At Verdict, Vikram Amar analyzes the legislature’s brief in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
In referring the question on Art 3(a) as to what was required for a product to be protected by a basic patent, he stated that he was “encouraged by what the [CJEU] said in Actavis v Sanofi and Actavis v Boehringer to believe that there is a realistic prospect of the Court providing further and better guidance to that which it has hitherto provided” (para 91). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:33 pm
Reed, the Court found that disclosure of the identities of petition signers did not, absent a particularized showing, so chill their petition signing as to violate their free speech rights; and in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:59 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the Horn defendants), and Audrey Sager, Esq., Steven Gellerman, Esq., and Sager & Gellerman, Esq. [read post]
