Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 23,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Court Rejects Oppressed Shareholder’s Bid for Dissolution or Buy-Out, Finds Money Damages Sufficient
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
In 2013, Jamal decided to sell his shares in the Corporations. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 5:29 pm
The US Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the Google v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 9:28 am
Case citation: Alexander v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:31 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
Norman v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 7:24 am
The case, Rutledge v Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, presents a challenge to the validity of state laws that regulate the reimbursements that pharmacies receive when they sell prescription drugs. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
Stowe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:43 am
Today's Nokia v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Back in June, we reported that suits brought under Title III of the Helms-Burton Act had suffered their first significant setback, but that many open questions remained. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
The judge who signed off on Doe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 10:28 pm
” Local Loan Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:58 am
AdoreMe, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:57 am
The tax shelter in the infamous Knetsch v. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
A “marketplace seller” is defined as a person who sells or offers for sale tangible personal property or the sale of services for delivery into Louisiana through a marketplace that is owned, operated, or controlled by a marketplace facilitator. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:25 am
It may therefore be a good idea to sell the matrimonial home (ie if they bought a house together), so that the money can be divided up accordingly. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:57 am
There have been further filings since the Epic Games v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The Court overturned the convictions in the Moore et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:45 pm
From Dinkins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:27 am
In this case, an appellate court affirmed the Illinois Department of Human Services’ decision to subject the decedent, who had applied for Medicaid benefits, to a penalty for selling his home for less than fair market value in the five years before applying for benefits. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:23 am
Immunex and Roche v. [read post]
