Search for: "Sellers v. State"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 3,989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 1:38 pm
Although Justice Souter noted in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:44 am
In United States v. 4.85 Acres of Land, No. 07-35310 (Sep. 29, 2008), the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the trial court should not have refused to admit evidence of sales at properties nearby the property taken, even though the sales occurred after the taking. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards. 3) Its long-term effects. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Gonzales, United States Attorney General, and Michael E. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 8:33 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
See Simone v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 5:30 pm
The case I'm talking about is Western Filter Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 3:55 pm
I’ll try not to be too geeky here, but the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion recently in Boschetto v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
After all, the Third Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 10:55 pm
Steiner v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:16 am
NSCC guarantees the transactions it processes by assuming the obligation of sellers to deliver shares to buyers. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
Boschetto v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:19 pm
Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
In Jannusch v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Webb v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:02 am
Jones Day v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
The district court enjoined enforcement of the two contested provisions because they have a disparate impact on out-of-state sellers. 2007 U.S. [read post]
