Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 10:22 am
Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
"But even apart from the merits -- which I briefly discussed when the panel's opinion came out a year and a half ago, and which arguably involves (as Judge Berzon cogently asserts in the dissent to today's opinion) "the epitome of an unreasonable agency interpretation" -- I wanted to point out that, to me, the sharp 6-5 split demonstrates a couple of realities.First, panel draws sometimes matter, even at the en banc stage. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:01 pm
In the other case, however, Martinez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
., v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
On Wednesday, March 4, in No. 08-192, Abuelhawa v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Instead, the Court first observed that the “…2003 amendment reversed the effect of Sharp v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
These statements are in sharp conflict with the advisory committee note to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which describes “the venerable practice of using expert testimony to educate the factfinder on general principles,” specifically mentioning as an example “how financial markets respond to corporate reports. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:21 pm
The only judge to review the rules so far, Judge Frederick Scullin, Jr. sitting in the Northern District of New York in Alexander v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:22 pm
What does "sharp" mean? [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:59 am
In sharp contrast to these cases, the DMV order indisputably required Officer Crump to retain Gamez's license. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:35 am
Ga. 2008), nor Sharp v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:58 am
Term has thus established a sharp contrast between EUO requests and IMEs. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Arnold Padgett v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Late last month, in Gottlieb v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 6:07 pm
===*Sara Burd-Sharpes, Kirsten Lewis and Eduardo Borges Martin (2008). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:02 pm
May 6, 2005); Sharp v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
The result would be a sharp decline in quality of care. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:55 pm
Yesterday the Arizona Court of Appeals published a textbook opinion reviewing a Medicare decision: Sharpe v. [read post]
