Search for: "State v. Country" Results 3701 - 3720 of 26,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:26 am by Adam Wagner
 For example, in Khan v Government of the United States of America, Mr Khan failed to convince the High Court that the United States justice system was inherently unfair. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
  Old Language: “described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country” New Language: “described in a printed publication or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public”   In the case of Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
  There now remains no state in the country totally without precedent concerning the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by Jacob Sapochnick
Víctor Nieblas, an immigration attorney based in Southern California, told CNN in September that the court's decision could affect hundreds of other young professionals in the United States who are seeking a license. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
(3) If the proprietor of an earlier Community trade mark has proved that that mark has a reputation in countries other than the Member State in which the national trade mark application has been lodged — which cover a substantial part of the territory of the European Union — may he also be required, notwithstanding that fact, to adduce conclusive proof in relation to that Member State? [read post]