Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 40,834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2022, 12:35 pm
UPDATE: In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
In the case of The State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
The announcement states the FTC intends to explore rules “cracking down” on the “business of collecting, analyzing, and profiting from information about people. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The 1959 case of Bibb v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:38 pm
In addition, thanks to Roe v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 11:01 am
A Supreme Court decision — Department of the Navy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 10:50 am
LSI Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 9:25 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:01 am
While the case raises the specific question of whether state courts may use state constitutional provisions to strike down regulations of congressional elections imposed by the legislature, the Court could answer the question more broadly to remove additional state-level checks on legislatures under the Elections Clause (with potential implications for the Electors Clause as well). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
In Love v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The present doctrinal development begins with Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 11:30 pm
The Sasol Oil case follows on from another High Court judgment handed down against the BEE Commission earlier this year. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
United States Servicemen’s Fund and Bogan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm
BULLETIN — The United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
" Williamson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:52 am
Similarly, in Downs v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am
There is a case from Ontario called R. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:05 am
" The agreement states that if a non-white teacher is subject to excess, MPS must excess a white teacher with the "next least" seniority. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 8:55 am
See Moore v. [read post]
