Search for: "State v. Laws"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 156,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
In Rose v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
(Tribal Law; Appelate Rules) Furman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
State. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
Adam Levitin already posted on this week's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:33 pm
., and we reprint it in its entirety:IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FLORIDA BAR,Complainant,v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
See also Minnesota v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:19 pm
About a dozen states are currently enforcing laws that ban nearly all abortions. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:28 pm
Ed Newcomer, Marie Palladini & Leah Jones, THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:09 am
Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (Case C-318/07); [2009] WLR (D) 27 “It was contrary to Community law to refuse income tax deductibility for a donation to a charity established in another member state where it was allowed in the case of charities established in the taxpayer's state and the taxpayer had no opportunity to show that the [...] [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hans v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:41 am
Why should states be immune from suit for violating federal law? [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:43 am
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2016 More Blog Entries: Stacy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York Buffalo Law School, has posted When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
To read the Court’s opinion in the case, Astrue v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 12:01 am
After a prior circuit panel urged en banc consideration to resolve conflict with other circuits, an en banc Sixth Circuit addressed whether state or federal spoliation law applies, in Adkins v. [read post]
13 Jun 2006, 8:06 am
Nevertheless, where state secrets are not disclosed to a court of law because of these interests, the resulting state of affairs is ‘tantamount to a removal of the court’s jurisdiction by executive ipse dixit’ (i.e. by the executive branch’s own say-so: Devenney v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
Similarly, in State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:49 pm
The National Law Journal features the Smith v. [read post]
