Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 3701 - 3720 of 13,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although his legal malpractice claims premised on defendants’ representation of him in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit arguably were timely and not barred by collateral estoppel, plaintiff failed to show that defendants’ alleged failures caused him to lose on that appeal (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 6:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here's a link to a more detailed summary.PD-1780-08, Pamela Shareka Langham v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 7:16 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The Patent Act directly states that a losing petitioner has a right to appeal if it loses the IPR. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 10:07 am
I am in favor of mandatory retirement, but sometimes you lose a good jurist too. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am by Eric Goldman
Everyone loses (except the lawyers, of course) when unmeritorious cases get past a Section 230 motion to dismiss. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in EPA v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
On February 24, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Cox v. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 10:25 pm
A case from New Hampshire - United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am by Zachary C. Jackson
JacksonAt the end of January, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut issued a decision in the matter of Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. v. [read post]