Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 16,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 4:14 am
They transformed the doctrine of equal protection, convincing courts that aliens should be protected from invidious state discrimination. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
Specifically, the Supreme Court should: (1) overturn Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:44 am
On Monday in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
HHJ Lewis noted the Court’s discretion to award a single award in the case or two or more libels, as stated in Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers [2017] EWHC 543 (QB). [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:14 am
The two rules affected a tiny fraction of voters, and there was little disparity between how minority and non-minority voters behaved. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
” Elsewhere in the Post, Barnes also has coverage of the government’s recent cert. petition in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
--Judicial SUPREMACY: One has to obey Supreme Court Precedent (inferior courts certainly burt maybe also everyone else (Cooper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 5:15 pm
MICHAEL LEVANDOSKI V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:29 pm
Texas and United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 11:28 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Andrew Cork v. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 2:59 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:35 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that the "class-of-one" theory of Equal Protection does not apply in the public employment context. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:14 pm
An 18-year-old Ferndale man, Yuriy V. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:31 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:55 pm
Hyatt and Knick v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
’ (United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:47 am
The Supreme Court in the UK has given its decision in the conjoined cases of Essop v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, concerning indirect discrimination. [read post]
