Search for: "State v. N. N."
Results 3701 - 3720
of 21,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
The court referred to its holding in Roper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 4:15 am
Florida State Athletic Com'n, 226 F.3d 1226, 1230 (11th Cir.2000) ( "Absent exceptional circumstances, a third party does not have standing to challenge injury to another party. [read post]
26 May 2008, 1:45 am
See COTW blog here, discussing United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:07 am
From Cody v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:44 am
Here are the materials in the matter of New Mexico et al v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 6:33 am
Supp. 3d 1013 (E.D.Cal. 2014); Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 12:07 pm
People of the State of New York v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" Troester v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
In such a circumstance, the Board stated that the FAA would have to yield, because the N-LG Act was enacted seven years after the FAA, and Section 15 of the N-LG Act repealed all acts and parts of acts in conflict with the N-LG Act. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
Slip op., at 13, n. 4. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
See Morgan Stanley v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
Supp. 3d 640, 645 n.4 (E.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:47 am
Jirak v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
Straub, 354 S.W.3d 529, 534 & n.14 (Ky. 2011); T & M Jewelry, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Teller v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:33 pm
N. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:45 am
Ethics Comm’n of State of Okla. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
