Search for: "State v. Scales"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 4,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm
In response to the dramatic expansion of the Spanish Crown during Emperor Charles V’s reign, elites in the court and the Emperor himself typically employed inspections as a means of collecting records and reports. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
Circuit’s subsequent decision in Rambus Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Legal organizations (departments and firms) should calculate what percentage of their total spend is directed to projects that will progress their ability to deliver at scale—i.e., the leveraging of expertise through process and technology such that an increase in work does not require a proportionate increase in human labor. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
This case shows again that special care needs to be taken with extension states and fees, because fewer remedies are available if these are missed. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court was the decision to permit federal preemption in the Riegel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 12:59 pm
Another classmate, Emily Podolnick, responded to the Teitiota v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:26 pm
But few condemn United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
The figurine also comes with accessories made to scale, such as an apple (with or without bite), a stool and a backdrop that reads 'One More Thing'. [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:34 pm
In today’s case (Cathcart v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Congress had good reason to create this privatized system of adjudication, given the sheer scale of online copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Representative, and a state court judge; and even members of the public invited to the FBI’s Citizens Academy. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
Specht v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am
— in California v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 1:49 am
Philippines v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 3:44 am
Purkayastha v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 6:43 am
Binnall’s lawsuit in Nevada state court, Law v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:54 am
Ah, how I wish courts would apply the same scrutiny to trademark harm stories.FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
