Search for: "State v. Smith"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 10,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Contrary to petitioner's contention, we do not find his case to be one of "the rarest of cases" in which an exception to the general rule applies (Matter of Taranto v City of Glen Cove, 212 AD3d at 828 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1211). [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:17 pm
Smith. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:15 am
State (cited above) and Russeau v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(a)(5) provides that a declarant is "unavailable" if he is absent from the hearing and the proponent of a statement has been unable to procure the declarant's attendance (or in the case of a hearsay exception... [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Y, the defendant in X v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
On Wednesday the court hears argument in US v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:00 pm
Helsinn v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:23 pm
MIKE SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY, Defendants. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 6:30 am
The Image of Liberty was Steven Douglas Smith’s at the University of San Diego School of Law. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am
It is for this reason that Smith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
The state's highest criminal court ruled that jurors who convicted Roy Gene Smith were wrongly kept from hearing evidence about his growing up in a crime-ridden Houston neighborhood. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Super. 1988); Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:58 pm
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
