Search for: "State v. Tech"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 5,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the District of New JerseyOpinion Date: 3/29/12Cite: Vibra-Tech Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
In Eagle v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
s Baldwin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
The case of Walton v. the United States presents an issue that has plagued many a defense counsel - what do you do when you... [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 12:26 pm
” Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K… [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:44 pm
Int’l Game Tech., 543 F.3d 657, 661 (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 9:01 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:46 am
Thingiverse allows Warhammer fans and tech savvy innovators to upload and download files for free and print a world of things, generally on their 3D printers. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:27 am
"To support its finding of fraud, the district court analogized to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:09 pm
In Oip Techs. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
(Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
” It cites Basic Inc v Levinson (1988) for the proposition that “information is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision or if the information would significantly alter the total mix of information made available. [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Result: Tennessee Tech v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
Anderson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
CONTRIBUTED BY Patricia V. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
In Davis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 11:00 pm
Citing Religious Tech. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm
And Motorola's argument that an ex ante (before standardization) perspective on FRAND rates is not acceptable runs counter to Judge Posner's position on FRAND royalties in Apple v. [read post]
