Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 3701 - 3720
of 14,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
Thus, the Federal Circuit held that 337 has extraterritorial reach.The case has a strong dissenting opinion arguing that Section 337 cannot regulate activity occurring entirely outside the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:52 pm
And, by in effect making the punishment for child rape and murder equivalent, a State may remove a strong incentive for the rapist not to kill his victim. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:49 am
Chamber of Commerce's lawsuit against the NLRB, Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:10 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
An intriguing little opinion today from the Sixth Circuit in US v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm
She sure sounded like the woman who taught that class, smart, strong, and direct.) [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
First, it demonstrates the importance of strong secondary indicia in an obviousness challenge. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:51 am
First, it demonstrates the importance of strong secondary indicia in an obviousness challenge. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:49 am
He stated that he confirmed that the phone belonged to Lara. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am
At Top of the Ninth, Merle Kahn breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:58 pm
Younger abstention -- in which a federal court with jurisdiction declines to exercise it -- embodies "a strong federal policy against federal-court interference with pending state judicial proceedings absent extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:16 pm
[State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 9:23 am
The Court in State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
You have to constantly police it and prevent others from using or diluting it to maintain strong protection. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
This is in response to the CJEU case of Maximiliam Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, which declared invalid the previous agreement called Safe Harbor (our take on the case here). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Several years ago, in Salcedo v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:49 pm
Section 81 of Title 25 requires approval by the Secretary of the Interior for certain contracts that relate to "Indian Lands," and defines that term as "lands the title to which is held by the United States in trust for an Indian tribe or lands the title to which is held by an Indian tribe subject to a restriction by the United States against alienation. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
The Respondent’s base of operations is the United States. [read post]
